Bond strength of adhesive resin cement with different adhesive systems

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication date
2017
Reading date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Metrics
Export
Abstract
To assess the immediate bond strength of a dual-cure adhesive resin cement to the hybridized dentin with different bonding systems. Fifty-six healthy human molars were randomly divided into 7 groups (n=8). After 3 longitudinal sections, the central cuts were included in PVC matrix and were submitted to dentin hybridization according to the groups: G1 - etch & rinse system with 3-step (Apder™ Scotchbond™ Multi-Purpose, 3M ESPE), G2 - etch & rinse system with 3-step (Optibond™ FL, Kerr), G3 - etch & rinse system with 3-step (All-Bond 3®, Bisco), G4 - etch & rinse simplified system (Adper™ Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE), G5 - self-etching system with one step (Bond Force, Tokuyama), G6 - universal system in moist dentin (Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE), G7 - universal system in dry dentin (Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE). Then all groups received the cementing of a self-adhesive resin cement cylinder (Duo-link, Bisco) made from a polypropylene matrix. In the evaluation of bond strength, the samples were subjected to the microshear test and evaluated according to the fracture pattern by optical microscopy. The Kruskal-Wallis test suggests a statistically significant difference between groups (p=0,039), and Tukey for multiple comparisons, indicating a statistically significant difference between G3 and G4 (p<0.05). It was verified high prevalence of adhesive failures, followed by mixed failure and cohesive in dentin. The technique and the system used to dentin hybridization are able to affect the immediate bond strength of resin cement dual adhesive.
Description
Bibliographic reference
Lorenzoni e Silva, Fabrizio ; Pamato, Saulo ; Kuga, Milton Carlos ; So, Marcus Vinícius Reis ; Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo. Bond strength of adhesive resin cement with different adhesive systems. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017. Vol. 9, no. 1: 96