Recordeu que es poden pujar les aportacions als sexennis de l'ANECA al repositori institucional, sense necessitat d’esperar que s’òbriga la convocatòria. Fer-ho amb antelació pot evitar imprevistos tècnics i facilitar la gestió. Articles: S’han de dipositar mitjançant la passarel·la GREC/RODERIC. Llibres, capítols de llibre o dades de recerca: S’han de dipositar directament a través de RODERIC. ________________________________________ Recordad que se pueden subir las aportaciones a los sexenios de la ANECA al repositorio institucional, sin necesidad de esperar a que se abra la convocatoria. Hacerlo con tiempo puede evitar imprevistos técnicos y facilitar la gestión. Artículos: Deben depositarse mediante la pasarela GREC/RODERIC. Libros, capítulos de libro o datos de investigación: Deben depositarse directamente a través de RODERIC
Journal article Add to Favorites
HandleDOI

Prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry in panoramic radiographs of adult individuals. A cross-sectional study

Directors

Keywords

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mandibular asymmetry is more common than previously thought. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry by means of the Habets index using panoramic radiographs obtained from adult individuals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated 210 panoramic radiographs performed in adults attending a private referral radiology center in Lima, Peru. Radiographs of both genders were considered, including permanent dentition and of good quality. A trained and calibrated evaluator assessed mandibular, condyle and ramus height using the Habets method, considering asymmetry when the difference between the two sides was greater than 3%. Fisher's exact test, the paired Student's t-test and finally binary logistic regression were used to determine the characteristics of the asymmetries. RESULTS: Mandibular asymmetry was present in 39.5%, condylar asymmetry in 81.4% and mandibular ramus asymmetry in 48.6%, with no differences between genders (P>0.05). Only women showed a difference between the two sides in mandibular (P=0.008), and condylar height (P=0.013), although multivariate analysis showed neither gender nor age to have any significant influence on the occurrence of mandibular, condylar or ramus asymmetries. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetries in the sample evaluated was significant, although most of these asymmetries can be considered mild, given that the highly sensitive Habets index classifies any difference greater than 3% as asymmetry. These asymmetries, although most of them could be clinically not very noticeable, should be considered when planning treatments. In addition, neither gender nor age was found to significantly influence the occurrence of these asymmetries. Key words:Asymmetry, condyle, mandible, orthodontics.

Bibliographic reference

Publisher

Medicina Oral S.L.
Universitat de València

Signature

Full item page

Other versions

Metrics

Export
endnotezotero
Cite
Citations
0 citations in
Google Scholar
| Other documents of authorship
Share

Document Viewer

Select a file:
Reload