Recordeu que es poden pujar les aportacions als sexennis de l'ANECA al repositori institucional, sense necessitat d’esperar que s’òbriga la convocatòria. Fer-ho amb antelació pot evitar imprevistos tècnics i facilitar la gestió. Articles: S’han de dipositar mitjançant la passarel·la GREC/RODERIC. Llibres, capítols de llibre o dades de recerca: S’han de dipositar directament a través de RODERIC. ________________________________________ Recordad que se pueden subir las aportaciones a los sexenios de la ANECA al repositorio institucional, sin necesidad de esperar a que se abra la convocatoria. Hacerlo con tiempo puede evitar imprevistos técnicos y facilitar la gestión. Artículos: Deben depositarse mediante la pasarela GREC/RODERIC. Libros, capítulos de libro o datos de investigación: Deben depositarse directamente a través de RODERIC
Journal article Add to Favorites
Handle

Moxifloxacin versus Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone in the management of odontogenic maxillofacial infectious processes: a preliminary, intrahospital, controlled clinical trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Publication Date

Reading Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Directors

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the days of hospitalization length between patients treated with Moxifloxacin with that of patients treated with a Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone combination and additionally, to isolate and identify the oral pathogens involved in orofacial odontogenic infections. Material and Methods: A pilot-controlled-clinical-trial was carried out on hospitalized patients with cervicofacial odontogenic abscesses or cellulitis, who were randomly asigned to two study groups: 1) patients who received Moxifloxacin, and 2) patients receiving Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone combination. Infiltrate samples were collected through transdermic or transmucosal punction and later cultured on a media specific for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Mean hospitalization duration in days until hospital discharge and susceptibility assessment in rates were established. Results: Mean hospitalization time in days of patients treated with Moxifloxacin was 7.0 ± 1.6 days, while in the Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone group, this was 8.4 ± 1.8 days, although significant difference could not be demonstrated ( p =0.074). A total of 43 strains were isolated, all of these Gram-positive. These strains appeared to be highly sen - sitive to Moxifloxacin (97.5%) and Ceftriaxone (92.5%). Conclusions: Moxifloxacin and Ceftriaxone appear to be potential convenient and rational alternatives to traditional antibiotics, for treating severe odontogenic infections, in conjunction with surgical extraoral incision, debridement, and drainage.

Bibliographic reference

Gómez Arámbula, Hansel ; Hidalgo Hurtado, Antonio ; Rodríguez Flores, Rosaura ; González Amaro, Ana María ; Garrocho Rangel, Arturo ; Pozos Guillén, Amaury de Jesús. Moxifloxacin versus Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone in the management of odontogenic maxillofacial infectious processes: a preliminary, intrahospital, controlled clinical trial. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2015, Vol. 7, No. 5: 634-639

Publisher

Signature

Full item page

Other versions

Document Viewer

Select a file:
Reload