Experimental trade-offs between different strategies for multihop communications evaluated over real deployments of wireless sensor network for environmental monitoring
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Experimental trade-offs between different strategies for multihop communications evaluated over real deployments of wireless sensor network for environmental monitoring

DSpace Repository

Experimental trade-offs between different strategies for multihop communications evaluated over real deployments of wireless sensor network for environmental monitoring

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Felici Castell, Santiago
dc.contributor.author Pérez Solano, Juan J.
dc.contributor.author Segura García, Jaume
dc.contributor.author García Pineda, Miguel
dc.contributor.author Soriano Asensi, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-06T14:01:45Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-06T14:01:45Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/69385
dc.description.abstract Although much work has been done since wireless sensor networks appeared, there is not a great deal of information available on real deployments that incorporate basic features associated with these networks, in particular multihop routing and long lifetimes features. In this article, an environmental monitoring application (Internet of Things oriented) is described, where temperature and relative humidity samples are taken by each mote at a rate of 2 samples/min and sent to a sink using multihop routing. Our goal is to analyse the different strategies to gather the information from the different motes in this context. The trade-offs between 'sending always' and 'buffering locally' approaches were analysed and validated experimentally, taking into account power consumption, lifetime, efficiency and reliability. When buffering locally, different options were considered such as saving in either local RAM or FLASH memory, as well different alternatives to reduce overhead with different packet sizes. The conclusion is that in terms of energy and durability, the best option is to reduce the overhead. Nevertheless, sending larger packets is not worthy when the probability of retransmission is high. If real-time monitoring is required, then sending always is better than buffering locally.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal Of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2018, vol. 14, num. 5, p. 1-10
dc.rights.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source Felici Castell, Santiago Pérez Solano, Juan J. Segura García, Jaume García Pineda, Miguel Soriano Asensi, Antonio 2018 Experimental trade-offs between different strategies for multihop communications evaluated over real deployments of wireless sensor network for environmental monitoring International Journal Of Distributed Sensor Networks 14 5 1 10
dc.subject Internet
dc.subject Xarxes locals sense fil Wi-Fi
dc.title Experimental trade-offs between different strategies for multihop communications evaluated over real deployments of wireless sensor network for environmental monitoring
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated 2019-03-06T14:01:45Z
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147718774465
dc.identifier.idgrec 130319

View       (1.077Mb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics