Recordeu que es poden pujar les aportacions als sexennis de l'ANECA al repositori institucional, sense necessitat d’esperar que s’òbriga la convocatòria. Fer-ho amb antelació pot evitar imprevistos tècnics i facilitar la gestió. Articles: S’han de dipositar mitjançant la passarel·la GREC/RODERIC. Llibres, capítols de llibre o dades de recerca: S’han de dipositar directament a través de RODERIC. ________________________________________ Recordad que se pueden subir las aportaciones a los sexenios de la ANECA al repositorio institucional, sin necesidad de esperar a que se abra la convocatoria. Hacerlo con tiempo puede evitar imprevistos técnicos y facilitar la gestión. Artículos: Deben depositarse mediante la pasarela GREC/RODERIC. Libros, capítulos de libro o datos de investigación: Deben depositarse directamente a través de RODERIC
Journal article Add to Favorites
HandleDOI

Evaluation of trabecular bone in individuals with periodontitis using fractal analysis: An observational cross-sectional study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Publication Date

Reading Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Directors

Keywords

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is very difficult to objectively evaluate the negative changes in bone structure due to periodontitis. The present study was aimed to evaluate the trabecular bone structure between healthy individuals and periodontitis patients by fractal analysis (FA) on digital panoramic radiographs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 50 periodontally healthy individuals (control group), 50 individuals with Stage 1 periodontitis (S1-P group), 50 individuals with Stage 2 periodontitis (S2-P), and 50 individuals with Stage 3 periodontitis (S3-P), a total of 200 individuals were included. The fractal dimension (FD) value of the trabecular bone in the interdental space between mandibular first molar and second premolar tooth roots was evaluated using Image J program. The mean FD values of the two regions were calculated by box counting method. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of all periodontal parameter values (p<0.05). The mean FD values of individuals diagnosed with periodontitis were 1.36±0.08 in the S1-P group, 1.35±0.07 in the S2-P group, 1.28±0.15 in the S3-P group, and 1.44±0.06 in the control group. When the FD values between the groups were examined, it was seen that there was a statistically significant difference between the control and individuals with periodontitis, and the mean FD values were significantly higher in the healthy group (p<0.05). The best receiver operator curve was identified for periodontitis at the ≤1.409 cut-off FD value (area under the curve: 0.828; 95% CI: 0.758-0.899); p=0.000, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FD evaluation can give an objective result about the effect of periodontitis on alveolar bone. The FD values of trabecular bone are different in healthy individuals and individuals with different stages of periodontitis. The findings suggested that a negative correlation between the periodontal data with the sites in which FD was measured and as the periodontitis stage progresses, FD decreases. Key words:Diagnosis, Periodontal Diseases, Radiographic Evaluation.

Bibliographic reference

Publisher

Medicina Oral S.L

Signature

Full item page

Other versions

Metrics

Export
endnotezotero
Cite
Citations
0 citations in
Share

Document Viewer

Select a file:
Reload