Justification, Attachments and Regret
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Justification, Attachments and Regret

DSpace Repository

Justification, Attachments and Regret

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Corbí, Josep E.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-10T11:45:52Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-10T11:45:52Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/81261
dc.description.abstract In *The View From Here*, Jay Wallace emphasises that an agent's capacity to regret a past decision is conditioned by the attachments that she may have developed as a result. Those attachments shape the point of view from which she retrospectively deliberates. Wallace stresses, however, that not every normative aspect of her decision is affected by this change in perspective, because her decision will remain as unjustified as it was in the past. I will argue, however, that this approach to justification is inconsistent with the normative import that Wallace ascribes to the actual dynamics of our attachments in his defence of the rationale of regret. If I am right, Wallace's approach is caught in the following dilemma: Either he renounces a nonperspectival approach to justification or he revises his view about the normative import of the actual dynamics of our attachments.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof European Journal of Philosophy, 2017, vol. 25, num. 4, p. 1718-1738
dc.rights.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source Corbí, Josep E. 2017 Justification, Attachments and Regret European Journal of Philosophy 25 4 1718 1738
dc.subject Filosofia
dc.title Justification, Attachments and Regret
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated 2022-01-10T11:45:52Z
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12265
dc.identifier.idgrec 125164

View       (225.0Kb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics