Arguing to convince : the rhetoric of scientific discourse
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Arguing to convince : the rhetoric of scientific discourse

DSpace Repository

Arguing to convince : the rhetoric of scientific discourse

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Albaladejo, Tomás es
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-15T08:05:57Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-15T08:05:57Z
dc.date.issued 2016 es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/79731
dc.description.abstract This paper deals with scientific discourse as a rhetorical discourse from the point of view of the structure of the classical parts of oral discourse (and all kinds of discourse). The role of argumentation in discourse, with the perlocutionary goal of convincing the receiver, is studied as the foundation of the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse. A scientific treatise by Santiago Ramón y Cajal is analysed using the tools provided by rhetoric in order to prove the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse. The main contribution of this paper is to establish the crucial role of argumentation in scientific discourse and to demonstrate its permeation of the entire discourse. es
dc.source Albaladejo, Tomás. Arguing to convince : the rhetoric of scientific discourse. En: Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, 6 2016: 128-133 es
dc.title Arguing to convince : the rhetoric of scientific discourse es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco es
dc.identifier.doi es

View       (955.5Kb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics