How to be a critical but reasonable debater : suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

How to be a critical but reasonable debater : suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups

DSpace Repository

How to be a critical but reasonable debater : suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Alcolea Banegas, Jesús es
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-14T11:19:47Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-14T11:19:47Z
dc.date.issued 2018 es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/79681
dc.description.abstract Discourse about pseudoscience usually accompanies dialogue about science. Despite attempts to separate the two domains, people still rely on pseudoscientific remedies. The ease with which beliefs become contagious, the popularity of certain products, and the verbiage of their sellers often leave us in the hands of so-called experts. Although the scientific method can help us to prove the ineffectiveness of certain remedies, we do not always have conclusive arguments to dispel doubts, and so we are left at the mercy of supposed technical knowledge or false scientific rigour. Faced with this, we must resort to critical thinking to respond to alleged experts and conduct ourselves reasonably. es
dc.source Alcolea Banegas, Jesús. How to be a critical but reasonable debater : suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups. En: Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, 8 2018: 196-202 es
dc.title How to be a critical but reasonable debater : suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco es
dc.identifier.doi es

View       (1.319Mb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics