Pseudoscience and bad science in biomedicine : analysis of evidence, health risk, and media dissemination
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Pseudoscience and bad science in biomedicine : analysis of evidence, health risk, and media dissemination

DSpace Repository

Pseudoscience and bad science in biomedicine : analysis of evidence, health risk, and media dissemination

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Casino, Gonzalo es
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-14T11:19:46Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-14T11:19:46Z
dc.date.issued 2018 es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/79676
dc.description.abstract Pseudoscience (false science) and science based on faulty and biased studies (bad science) produce false or uncertain knowledge, with poor or no evidence. Both represent a health risk: pseudoscience-based therapies because they can replace or delay conventional treatments, and low-quality biomedicine because it promotes medical interventions that can be dangerous. In the press, alternative therapies are less prevalent than low-quality research, while the former tends to be framed negatively and the latter favourably. Both require more thorough and rigorous studies to better understand their negative effects on critical thinking, economics, and health-related decision making. es
dc.source Casino, Gonzalo. Pseudoscience and bad science in biomedicine : analysis of evidence, health risk, and media dissemination. En: Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, 8 2018: 156-163 es
dc.title Pseudoscience and bad science in biomedicine : analysis of evidence, health risk, and media dissemination es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco es
dc.identifier.doi es

View       (1.439Mb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics