From creationism to economics : how far should analyses of pseudoscience extend?
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

From creationism to economics : how far should analyses of pseudoscience extend?

DSpace Repository

From creationism to economics : how far should analyses of pseudoscience extend?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Edis, Taner es
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-14T11:19:46Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-14T11:19:46Z
dc.date.issued 2018 es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/79674
dc.description.abstract Both the scientific and philosophical problems with classic pseudosciences such as astrology and creationism are well known, leading to institutions that are not structured to promote cognitive advancement. A focus on institutions, however, also encourages recognition of gray areas, such as parapsychology, which combines scientifically dubious claims with institutions that are comparable to most social sciences in their structure. Furthermore, institutional approaches to pseudoscience also raise questions about some academically mainstream fields such as economics. In such cases, pseudoscientific aspects of practice are harder to identify, highlighting the need to place analyses of pseudoscience in a wider context of institutional pathologies. es
dc.source Edis, Taner. From creationism to economics : how far should analyses of pseudoscience extend?. En: Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, 8 2018: 140-147 es
dc.title From creationism to economics : how far should analyses of pseudoscience extend? es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco es
dc.identifier.doi es

View       (1.559Mb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics