Work-life management for workforce maintenance: A qualitative comparative study
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Work-life management for workforce maintenance: A qualitative comparative study

DSpace Repository

Work-life management for workforce maintenance: A qualitative comparative study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Yee, Rachel W.Y.
dc.contributor.author Miquel Romero, María José
dc.contributor.author Cruz Ros, Sonia
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-18T10:47:47Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-18T10:47:47Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/77298
dc.description.abstract Nowadays, owing to the changing nature of the work environment, with its ever-increasing demands, the quality of working life and its relationship with the individual's wellbeing are recognized worldwide as vital for the workforce. This study analyzes the role of employees' perception of five quality of working life attributes (specifically workplace conditions, working life autonomy, corporate citizenship, remuneration, and workplace diversity and inclusion) in ensuring the individual's wellbeing focusing in particular on workers' perception of work-life balance, working life opportunities, and health and wellness. The results of the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis reveal the same various configurations for the three outcomes that suggest a new perspective towards understanding the factors in employees' working life that enhance their wellbeing, and so improve workforce maintenance. The results have managerial implications related to work-life management for workforce maintenance.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Business Research, 2020, vol. 121, p. 329-337
dc.rights.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source Yee, Rachel W.Y. Miquel Romero, María José Cruz Ros, Sonia 2020 Work-life management for workforce maintenance: A qualitative comparative study Journal of Business Research 121 329 337
dc.subject Treball
dc.title Work-life management for workforce maintenance: A qualitative comparative study
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.date.updated 2021-01-18T10:47:47Z
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.029
dc.identifier.idgrec 142121

View       (585.5Kb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics