Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants : an overview of systematic reviews
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants : an overview of systematic reviews

DSpace Repository

Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants : an overview of systematic reviews

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sales, Pedro Henrique da Hora es
dc.contributor.author Gomes, Marcus Vinícius Silva Weigel es
dc.contributor.author de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa es
dc.contributor.author Camello de Lima, Fernando-José es
dc.contributor.author Leão, Jair Carneiro es
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-15T09:31:02Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-15T09:31:02Z
dc.date.issued 2020 es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/77148
dc.description.abstract Oral rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae features high complexity, for which there are several therapeutic modalities reported on scientific literature. Zygomatic implant placement is a viable option that features low morbidity and allows immediate prosthetic loading. The purpose of the present study was to determine the methodological quality of systematic reviews that assessed the effectiveness of zygomatic implants placed in atrophic maxillae. Searches were conducted on Medline via Pubmed, LILACS, Dare Cochrane, Scopus, and Sigle via Open Grey up to June 2019. Seven systematic reviews were eligible for Overview and comprised a total of 2313 patients, 4812 zygomatic implants, and a 96,72% success rate. Common surgical complications, in decreasing order, were: maxillary sinusitis, peri-implant mucositis, prosthetic fracture, and infections. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool, which revealed that six systematic reviews showed critically low methodological quality and one review was assessed as of low methodological quality. Zygomatic implants seem to be an adequate option for atrophic maxilla rehabilitation, however, new studies with a higher methodological rigor are needed to provide more reliable results to professionals and patients undergoing this modality of oral rehabilitation. es
dc.source Sales, Pedro Henrique da Hora ; Gomes, Marcus Vinícius Silva Weigel ; de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa ; Camello de Lima, Fernando-José ; Leão, Jair Carneiro. Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants : an overview of systematic reviews. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 25 4 2020: 4- es
dc.title Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants : an overview of systematic reviews es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.23569 es

View       (771.2Kb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics