NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation

DSpace Repository

Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation

dc.contributor.author	Pellicer Chover, Hilario	es
dc.contributor.author	Peñarrocha Oltra, David	es
dc.contributor.author	Aloy Prósper, Amparo	es
dc.contributor.author	Sanchis González, José Carlos	es
dc.contributor.author	Peñarrocha Diago, María	es
dc.contributor.author	Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel	es
dc.date.accessioned	2018-05-02T12:04:11Z
dc.date.available	2018-05-02T12:04:11Z
dc.date.issued	2017	es
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10550/65942
dc.description.abstract	To compare the technique of high speed drilling with irrigation and low speed drilling without irrigation in order to evaluate the success rate and peri-implant bone loss at 12 months of follow-up. A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was carried out in patients requiring dental implants to rehabilitate their unitary edentulism. Patients were recruited from the Oral Surgery Unit of the University of Valencia (Spain) between September 2014 and August 2015. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to two groups: group A (high-speed drilling with irrigation) and group B (low-speed drilling without irrigation). The success rate and peri-implant bone loss were recorded at 12 months of follow-up. Twenty-five patients (9 men and 16 women) with 30 implants were enrolled in the study: 15 implants in group A and 15 implants in group B. The mean bone loss of the implants in group A and group B was 0.83 ± 0.73 mm and 0.62 ± 0.70 mm, respectively (p > 0.05). In the maxilla, the bone loss was 1.04 ± 0.63 mm in group A and 0.71 ± 0.36 mm in group B (p > 0.05), while bone loss in the mandible was 0.59 ± 0.80 mm in group A and 0.69 ± 0.77 mm in group B (p > 0.05). The implant success rate at 12 months was 93.3% in group A and 100% in group B. Within the limitations of the study, the low-speed drilling technique presented peri-implant bone loss outcomes similar to those of the conventional drilling technique at 12 months of follow-up.	es
dc.source	Pellicer Chover, Hilario ; Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Aloy Prósper, Amparo ; Sanchis González, José Carlos ; Peñarrocha Diago, María ; Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel. Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 22 6 2017: 12-	es
dc.title	Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS	es
dc.identifier.doi	10.4317/medoral.21694	es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES