Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation

DSpace Repository

Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pellicer Chover, Hilario es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Oltra, David es
dc.contributor.author Aloy Prósper, Amparo es
dc.contributor.author Sanchis González, José Carlos es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, María es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel es
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-02T12:04:11Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-02T12:04:11Z
dc.date.issued 2017 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/65942
dc.description.abstract To compare the technique of high speed drilling with irrigation and low speed drilling without irrigation in order to evaluate the success rate and peri-implant bone loss at 12 months of follow-up. A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was carried out in patients requiring dental implants to rehabilitate their unitary edentulism. Patients were recruited from the Oral Surgery Unit of the University of Valencia (Spain) between September 2014 and August 2015. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to two groups: group A (high-speed drilling with irrigation) and group B (low-speed drilling without irrigation). The success rate and peri-implant bone loss were recorded at 12 months of follow-up. Twenty-five patients (9 men and 16 women) with 30 implants were enrolled in the study: 15 implants in group A and 15 implants in group B. The mean bone loss of the implants in group A and group B was 0.83 ± 0.73 mm and 0.62 ± 0.70 mm, respectively (p > 0.05). In the maxilla, the bone loss was 1.04 ± 0.63 mm in group A and 0.71 ± 0.36 mm in group B (p > 0.05), while bone loss in the mandible was 0.59 ± 0.80 mm in group A and 0.69 ± 0.77 mm in group B (p > 0.05). The implant success rate at 12 months was 93.3% in group A and 100% in group B. Within the limitations of the study, the low-speed drilling technique presented peri-implant bone loss outcomes similar to those of the conventional drilling technique at 12 months of follow-up. es
dc.source Pellicer Chover, Hilario ; Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Aloy Prósper, Amparo ; Sanchis González, José Carlos ; Peñarrocha Diago, María ; Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel. Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 22 6 2017: 12- es
dc.title Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.21694 es

View       (1.172Mb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics