Comparison of the root canal debridement ability of two single file systems with a conventional multiple rotary system in long oval-shaped root canals : in vitro study
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparison of the root canal debridement ability of two single file systems with a conventional multiple rotary system in long oval-shaped root canals : in vitro study

DSpace Repository

Comparison of the root canal debridement ability of two single file systems with a conventional multiple rotary system in long oval-shaped root canals : in vitro study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author khoshbin, Elham es
dc.contributor.author Shokri, Abbas es
dc.contributor.author Donyavi, Zakieh es
dc.contributor.author Shahriari, Shahriar es
dc.contributor.author Salehimehr, Golsa es
dc.contributor.author Farhadian, Maryam es
dc.contributor.author Kavandi, Zeinab es
dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-15T09:24:26Z
dc.date.available 2017-11-15T09:24:26Z
dc.date.issued 2017 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/63045
dc.description.abstract This study sought to compare the root canal debridement ability of Neolix, Reciproc and ProTaper rotary systems in long oval-shaped root canals. Eighty five extracted single-rooted human teeth with long oval-shaped single root canals were selected and divided into three experimental groups(n=25) and one control group (n= 10). Root canals were filled with Vitapex radiopaque contrast medium and prepared with Neolix, Reciproc or ProTaper systems. The control group only received irrigation. Digital radiographs were obtained at baseline and postoperatively and subjected to digital subtraction. The percentage of reduction in contrast medium was quantified at 0-5 mm and 5-10 mm distances from the apex. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and t-test. The mean percentage of the contrast medium removed was not significantly different in the 0-5mm segment among the three groups (P=0.6). In the 5-10mm segment a significant difference was found in this regard among the ProTaper and Reciproc groups (P=0.02) and the highest mean percentage of contrast medium was removed by ProTaper. But, difference between ProTaper and Neolix as well as Neolix and Reciproc was not significant. In Neolix (P=0.024) and Reciproc (P=0.002) systems, the mean percentage of the contrast medium removed from the 0-5mm segment was significantly greater than that in 5-10mm segment; however, this difference was not significant in ProTaper group (P=0.069). Neolix single-file system may be a suitable alternative to ProTaper multiple-file system in debridement of long oval shaped canals. es
dc.source khoshbin, Elham ; Shokri, Abbas ; Donyavi, Zakieh ; Shahriari, Shahriar ; Salehimehr, Golsa ; Farhadian, Maryam ; Kavandi, Zeinab. Comparison of the root canal debridement ability of two single file systems with a conventional multiple rotary system in long oval-shaped root canals : in vitro study. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 9 8 2017: 939-944 es
dc.title Comparison of the root canal debridement ability of two single file systems with a conventional multiple rotary system in long oval-shaped root canals : in vitro study es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/jced.52977 es

View       (900.2Kb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics