|
|
|
Martínez Rodríguez, Natalia; Barona Dorado, Cristina; Martín Ares, María; Cortés-Bretón Brinkman, Jorge; Martínez González, José María
|
|
This document is a artículo publicadoDate2012
|
|
Este documento está disponible también en :
http://hdl.handle.net/10550/59986
|
|
Objectives: To evaluate the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of articaine versus lidocaine at equal vasoconstrictor concentration. Study Design: A total of 96 male and female patients who underwent surgical treatment of the lower third molar participated. Patients were randomly assigned to articaine hydrochloride with epinephrine 1:100,000 and lidocaine hydrochloride with epinephrine 1:100,000. The variables analysed were latency period, duration of anaesthetic effect, tolerance and adverse reactions. Results: Both the latency period and the duration of anaesthetic effect were greater for articaine, although the differences were not statistically significant. Latency: mean difference of 2.70 ± 2.12 minutes (95%CI of -1.51 minutes - 6.92 minutes). Duration: mean difference of -33 minutes 5 seconds ± 31 minutes (95% CI -1 hour 35 minutes - 29 minutes). There were 4 adverse events that did not require the patients to be withdrawn from the study. Conclusions: The anaesthetics in this study have very similar properties for use in surgery and have demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile. © Medicina Oral.
|
|
Martínez Rodríguez, Natalia ; Barona Dorado, Cristina ; Martín Ares, María ; Cortés-Bretón Brinkman, Jorge ; Martínez González, José María. Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. : a comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 17 2 2012: 5- |
|
|