Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia after diode laser oral surgery: an experimen tal study
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia after diode laser oral surgery: an experimen tal study

DSpace Repository

Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia after diode laser oral surgery: an experimen tal study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Seoane, Juan es
dc.contributor.author González Mosquera, Antonio es
dc.contributor.author García Martín, J.M. es
dc.contributor.author García Caballero, Lucía es
dc.contributor.author Seoane Romero, Juan M. es
dc.contributor.author Varela Centelles, Pablo Ignacio es
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-23T13:40:23Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-23T13:40:23Z
dc.date.issued 2015 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/48344
dc.relation http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/citart?info=link&codigo=5219415&orden=0 es
dc.source Seoane, Juan ; González Mosquera, Antonio ; García Martín, J.M. ; García Caballero, Lucía ; Seoane Romero, Juan M. ; Varela Centelles, Pablo Ignacio. Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia after diode laser oral surgery: an experimen tal study. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed inglesa, 2015, Vol. 20, No. 5: 7- es
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia after diode laser oral surgery: an experimen tal study es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.description.abstractenglish Background : To examine the process of epithelial reparation in a surgical wound caused by diode laser. Material and Methods : A n experimental study with 27 Sprage-Dawley rats was undertaken. The animals were randomly allocated to two experimental groups, whose individuals underwent glossectomy by means of a diode laser at different wattages, and a control group treated using a number 15 scalpel blade. The animals were slaughtered at the 2nd, 7th, and 14th day after glossectomy. The specimens were independently studied by two pathologists (blinded for the specimens’ group). Results: At the 7th day, re-epithelisation was slightly faster for the control group (conventional scalpel) ( p =0.011). At the 14th day, complete re-epithelization was observed for all groups. The experimental groups displayed a pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia. Conclusions: It is concluded that, considering the limitations of this kind of experimental studies, early re-epithelisation occurs slightly faster when a conventional scalpel is used for incision, although re-epithelisation is completed in two weeks no matter the instrument used. In addition, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia is a potential event after oral mucosa surgery with diode laser. Knowledge about this phenomenon (not previously described) may prevent diagnostic mistakes and inadequate treatment approaches, particularly when dealing with potentially malignant oral lesions. es

View       (1.426Mb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics