NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

El refugio de la claridad

DSpace Repository

El refugio de la claridad

dc.contributor.author	Corbí, Josep E.
dc.date.accessioned	2015-03-11T07:41:39Z
dc.date.available	2015-03-11T07:41:39Z
dc.date.issued	2010
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10550/42675
dc.description.abstract	A stress on clarity and argumentation may serve as a refuge against quackery, but often those who focus on such methodological principles tend to identify clarity with literalness and argumentation with formalization. My reflection upon the limits of a philosophical style inspired in such an identification is mainly concerned with the use of thought experiments in the elucidation of our moral practices and, more specifically, with the relevance of John Rawls¿ original position for the determination of the basic principles of justice. To this purpose, I emphasize that the relevance of the original position rests on a matching assumption according to which, if agents deliberate appropriately, there should not be any gap between our judgments concerning justice about a hypothetical situation and our judgments whenever we are actually confronted with it. I will, nevertheless, explore a particular moral experience, namely, that of the soldier, only to conclude that such an assumption is untenable. More specifically, I will defend the deliberative virtues of an expressive awareness of certain facts as opposed to a mere declarative awareness of them. In the last section, I will derive some implications of this distinction as to the articulation of a philosophical style.
dc.language.iso	spa
dc.relation.ispartof	Análisis Filosófico, 2010, vol. XXX, num. 1, p. 89-121
dc.source	Corbí, Josep E. 2010 El refugio de la claridad Análisis Filosófico XXX 1 89 121
dc.subject	Coneixement, Teoria del
dc.title	El refugio de la claridad
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.date.updated	2015-03-11T07:41:40Z
dc.identifier.idgrec	065835
dc.rights.accessRights	open access	es_ES