Influence of surface preparation on fracture load of resin composite-based repairs
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Influence of surface preparation on fracture load of resin composite-based repairs

DSpace Repository

Influence of surface preparation on fracture load of resin composite-based repairs

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Agustín Panadero, Rubén es
dc.contributor.author Mateos Palacios, Rocío es
dc.contributor.author Román Rodríguez, Juan Luis es
dc.contributor.author Solá Ruiz, María Fernanda es
dc.contributor.author Fons Font, Antonio es
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-26T12:37:12Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-26T12:37:12Z
dc.date.issued 2015 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/42402
dc.source Agustín Panadero, Rubén ; Mateos Palacios, Rocío ; Román Rodríguez, Juan Luis ; Solá Ruiz, María Fernanda ; Fons Font, Antonio. Influence of surface preparation on fracture load of resin composite-based repairs. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2015, Vol. 7, No. 1: 80-83 es
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Influence of surface preparation on fracture load of resin composite-based repairs es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.description.abstractenglish The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the fracture load of composite-based repairs to fractured zirconium oxide (Z) crowns and to ceramic-fused-to-metal (CM) crowns, comparing different mechanical surface preparation methods. A total of 75 crowns were repaired; samples then underwent dynamic loading and thermocycling. Final fracture load values for failure of the repaired crowns were measured and the type of fracture registered. Group I: CM: Surface preparation with a diamond bur + 9.5% Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) etching; Group II): CM: air-particle (Al 2 O 3 ) + 9.5% HF; Group III: CM: Silica coating (SiO 2 ); Group IV): Z: air-particle (Al 2 O 3 ) + HF 9.5%; Group V) Z: Silica coating (SiO 2 ). Of the three CM groups, Group I (CM-diamond bur) showed the highest mean failure value, with significant difference in comparison with Group III (CM-silica coating). For the zirconia groups, the highest value was obtained by Group V (silica coating). es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

View       (1.069Mb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics