Comparison between anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cancer patients-A quality of life analysis
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparison between anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cancer patients-A quality of life analysis

DSpace Repository

Comparison between anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cancer patients-A quality of life analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Xiao, Yan es
dc.contributor.author Zhu, Juanfang es
dc.contributor.author Cai, Xiangping es
dc.contributor.author Wang, Jing es
dc.contributor.author Liu, Fei es
dc.contributor.author Wang, Haibin es
dc.date.accessioned 2014-07-04T07:51:48Z
dc.date.available 2014-07-04T07:51:48Z
dc.date.issued 2013 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/36836
dc.relation http://www.medicinaoral.com/pubmed/medoralv18_i6_p856.pdf es
dc.source Xiao, Yan ; Zhu, Juanfang ; Cai, Xiangping ; Wang, Jing ; Liu, Fei ; Wang, Haibin. Comparison between anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cancer patients-A quality of life analysis. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed inglesa, 2013, Vol. 18, No. 6: 856-861 es
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Comparison between anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cancer patients-A quality of life analysis es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.description.abstractenglish The aim of this study was to compare the differences between anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps (ALTFF) and pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) for reconstruction in oral cancer patients. Method and Patients: who received free flap or PMMF reconstruction after ablation surgeries were eligible for the current study. The patients' demographic data, medical history, and quality of life scores(Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36) and the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaires were collected. Results: 81 of 118 questionnaires were returned (68.64%). There was signi.cant differences between two groups in the gender (P<0.005). Patients reconstructed with ALTFF had better appearance domains and better shoulders domains, in addition to better role emotion domains. Conclusions: Using either PMMF or ALTFF for reconstruction of oral defects after cancer resection signi.cantly in.uences a patient's quality of life. Data from this study provide useful information for physicians and patients during their discussion of reconstruction modalities for oral cancers. es

View       (453.9Kb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics