Effects of ultrasonically activated irrigants with or without surfactant on smear layer removal after post space preparation
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Effects of ultrasonically activated irrigants with or without surfactant on smear layer removal after post space preparation

DSpace Repository

Effects of ultrasonically activated irrigants with or without surfactant on smear layer removal after post space preparation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Turker, Sevinc Aktemur es
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Zeliha es
dc.contributor.author Ozcelik, Bahar es
dc.contributor.author Gorduysus, Melahat es
dc.contributor.author Altundasar, Emre es
dc.date.accessioned 2014-05-21T12:45:30Z
dc.date.available 2014-05-21T12:45:30Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/35288
dc.source Turker, Sevinc Aktemur ; Yilmaz, Zeliha ; Ozcelik, Bahar ; Gorduysus, Melahat ; Altundasar, Emre. Effects of ultrasonically activated irrigants with or without surfactant on smear layer removal after post space preparation. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2012, Vol. 4, No. 5: 260-265 es
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Effects of ultrasonically activated irrigants with or without surfactant on smear layer removal after post space preparation es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.description.abstractenglish The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different NaOCl and EDTA formulations with/without ultrasonic use on smear layer removal and root canal surface characteristics after post space preparation. Study design: After post space preparations, forty-six teeth were subjected to different post space irrigation regimes; G1, 17% EDTA; G2, 17% EDTA+Ultrasonic activation; G3, EDTA-T; G4, EDTA-T+Ultrasonic activation; G5, NaOCl; G6, NaOCl+Ultrasonic activation. Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope and scored for debris and smear layer removal and dentinal tubule opening and statistically analyzed with Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's test. Significance value was set at p<0.05. Results: EDTA and EDTA-T groups showed significantly better efficiency than the other groups in the each parts of the samples in terms of smear layer removal (p<0.05). In terms of dentinal tubule opening, EDTA, EDTA+Ultrasonic and EDTA-T groups had significantly better efficacy than the other groups in the middle and coronal parts of the samples (p<0.05). Conclusions: Ultrasonic activation did not significantly improve the efficiency of the irrigants. es

View       (700.8Kb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics