The paper examines a specific problem in the controversial Dialogus de oratoribus: the issue of the great lacuna between chapters 35 and 36. The author of the article places in historical perspective the most important arguments uncovered by investigations in this area, especially those of the twentieth century. In order to determine the size and content of the missing part, the analysis is organized around two central points: 1) the manuscript tradition, and 2) the comparison between the book and other dialogues.... [Leer más...]