Techniques for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Techniques for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review

DSpace Repository

Techniques for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Carreras Torras, Clàudia es
dc.contributor.author Gay Escoda, Cosme es
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-06T07:21:13Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-06T07:21:13Z
dc.date.issued 2015 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/45045
dc.relation http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/citart?info=link&codigo=5122594&orden=0 es
dc.source Carreras Torras, Clàudia ; Gay Escoda, Cosme. Techniques for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed inglesa, 2015, Vol. 20, No. 3: 17- es
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Techniques for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.description.abstractenglish Background and objectives: The diagnosis of early oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is of paramount clinical importance given the mortality rate of late stage disease. The aim of this study is to review the literature to assess the current situation and progress in this area. Material and Methods: A search in Cochrane and PubMed (January 2006 to December 2013) has been used with the key words “squamous cell carcinoma”, “early diagnosis” “oral cavity”, “Potentially Malignant Disorders” y “premalignant lesions”. The inclusion criteria were the use of techniques for early diagnosis of OSCC and OPMD, 7 years aged articles and publications written in English, French or Spanish. The exclusion criteria were case reports and studies in other languages. Results: Out of the 89 studies obtained initially from the search 60 articles were selected to be included in the systematic review: 1 metaanalysis, 17 systematic reviews, 35 prospective studies, 5 retrospective studies, 1 consensus and 1 semi-structured interviews. Conclusions: The best diagnostic technique is that which we have sufficient experience and training. Definitely tissue biopsy and histopathological examination should remain the gold standard for oral cancer diagnose. In this systematic review it has not been found sufficient scientific evidence on the majority of proposed techniques for early diagnosis of OSCC, therefore more extensive and exhaustive studies are needed. es

View       (466.6Kb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics