Historiografía de la filosofía y neohistoricismo
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Historiografía de la filosofía y neohistoricismo

DSpace Repository

Historiografía de la filosofía y neohistoricismo

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Prior Olmos, Angel es
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-16T11:20:16Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-16T11:20:16Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/43167
dc.source Prior Olmos, Angel. Historiografía de la filosofía y neohistoricismo. En: Quaderns de Filosofia i Ciència, 2012, No. 42: 91 es
dc.subject Hª y Fª de la Ciencia es
dc.subject Ciencias básicas y experimentales es
dc.subject Filosofía. Etica es
dc.subject Humanidades es
dc.title Historiografía de la filosofía y neohistoricismo es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::FILOSOFÍA es
dc.description.abstractenglish Article redefines the classic question of the history of Philosophy, its forms, meaning and justification, for this it incorporates the basic positions held on the subject by Fernando Montero and considers its connection with other contemporary approaches such as those of R. Rorty, with his distinction between historical reconstruction, rational reconstruction and Geistegeschichte approach, as three valid forms for the history of philosophy, that may also connect with the intellectual history, which takes us to the major historiographical transformations occurring along the last five decades associated with the names of Foucault, Koselleck, Blumenberg, Skinner and Pocock. Throughout this development what is in it of neohistoricism should be raised, i.e. a historiography that distances from the present, as claimed by Skinner, Blumenberg and Montero itself. The question then leads to the evaluation of meaning of this neohistoricism. es

View       (2.696Mb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics