Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone
NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone

DSpace Repository

Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pérez Sayáns, Mario es
dc.contributor.author León Camacho, María De Los Ángeles es
dc.contributor.author Somoza Martín, José Manuel es
dc.contributor.author Fernández González, Beatriz es
dc.contributor.author Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín, Silvia es
dc.contributor.author Gándara Rey, José Manuel es
dc.contributor.author García García, Abel es
dc.date.accessioned 2014-05-29T07:11:33Z
dc.date.available 2014-05-29T07:11:33Z
dc.date.issued 2013 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/35648
dc.source Pérez Sayáns, Mario ; León Camacho, María De Los Ángeles ; Somoza Martín, José Manuel ; Fernández González, Beatriz ; Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín, Silvia ; Gándara Rey, José Manuel ; García García, Abel. Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed inglesa, 2013, Vol. 18, No. 4: 686-692 es
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone es
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article en
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion en
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.description.abstractenglish Introduction: Vertical osteogenic alveolar distraction (VOAD) allows for the augmentation of the alveolar ridge for the placement of dental implants in atrophic alveolar ridges. The goal of this paper is to assess long-term peri- implant bone resorption in implants placed on bones subjected to VOAD, comparing it with a group of patients who had implants placed directly on the alveolar bone without previous bone regeneration. Material and Methods: We conducted a follow-up study on 32 patients who were divided into two groups: The Distraction Group (14 patients), and the Distraction-Free Group (18 patients), who received a total of 100 implants. Peri-implant bone loss was measured by means of panoramic X-rays, at the time of loading and one year later, and in 35 implants of each group after 3 years of functional loading. Results: The peri-implant bone resorption (PBR) average observed in the Distraction Group at the time of prosthetic placement is higher (0.50±0.09 mm) than in the Distraction-Free Group (0.25±0.06 mm), showing statistically significant results (p=0.047). PBR levels 1 year after loading were the same for both groups (0.66 mm). At 3 years, they were higher in the Distraction Group (1.03 ± 0.22 mm vs. 0.68 ± 0.08 mm). es

View       (998.7Kb)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics